Types of Injection

Edit this page

Making a class's dependencies explicit and requiring that they be injected into it is a good way of making a class more reusable, testable and decoupled from others.

There are several ways that the dependencies can be injected. Each injection point has advantages and disadvantages to consider, as well as different ways of working with them when using the service container.

Constructor Injection

The most common way to inject dependencies is via a class's constructor. To do this you need to add an argument to the constructor signature to accept the dependency:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
// src/Mail/NewsletterManager.php
namespace App\Mail;

// ...
class NewsletterManager
{
    private $mailer;

    public function __construct(MailerInterface $mailer)
    {
        $this->mailer = $mailer;
    }

    // ...
}

You can specify what service you would like to inject into this in the service container configuration:

1
2
3
4
5
6
# config/services.yaml
services:
    # ...

    App\Mail\NewsletterManager:
        arguments: ['@mailer']

Tip

Type hinting the injected object means that you can be sure that a suitable dependency has been injected. By type-hinting, you'll get a clear error immediately if an unsuitable dependency is injected. By type hinting using an interface rather than a class you can make the choice of dependency more flexible. And assuming you only use methods defined in the interface, you can gain that flexibility and still safely use the object.

There are several advantages to using constructor injection:

  • If the dependency is a requirement and the class cannot work without it then injecting it via the constructor ensures it is present when the class is used as the class cannot be constructed without it.
  • The constructor is only ever called once when the object is created, so you can be sure that the dependency will not change during the object's lifetime.

These advantages do mean that constructor injection is not suitable for working with optional dependencies. It is also more difficult to use in combination with class hierarchies: if a class uses constructor injection then extending it and overriding the constructor becomes problematic.

Immutable-setter Injection

Another possible injection is to use a method which returns a separate instance by cloning the original service, this approach allows you to make a service immutable:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
// src/Mail/NewsletterManager.php
namespace App\Mail;

// ...
use Symfony\Component\Mailer\MailerInterface;

class NewsletterManager
{
    private $mailer;

    /**
     * @required
     * @return static
     */
    public function withMailer(MailerInterface $mailer): self
    {
        $new = clone $this;
        $new->mailer = $mailer;

        return $new;
    }

    // ...
}

In order to use this type of injection, don't forget to configure it:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
# config/services.yaml
services:
     # ...

     app.newsletter_manager:
         class: App\Mail\NewsletterManager
         calls:
             - withMailer: !returns_clone ['@mailer']

Note

If you decide to use autowiring, this type of injection requires that you add a @return static docblock in order for the container to be capable of registering the method.

This approach is useful if you need to configure your service according to your needs, so, here's the advantages of immutable-setters:

  • Immutable setters works with optional dependencies, this way, if you don't need a dependency, the setter doesn't need to be called.
  • Like the constructor injection, using immutable setters force the dependency to stay the same during the lifetime of a service.
  • This type of injection works well with traits as the service can be composed, this way, adapting the service to your application requirements is easier.
  • The setter can be called multiple times, this way, adding a dependency to a collection becomes easier and allows you to add a variable number of dependencies.

The disadvantages are:

  • As the setter call is optional, a dependency can be null when calling methods of the service. You must check that the dependency is available before using it.
  • Unless the service is declared lazy, it is incompatible with services that reference each other in what are called circular loops.

Setter Injection

Another possible injection point into a class is by adding a setter method that accepts the dependency:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
// src/Mail/NewsletterManager.php
namespace App\Mail;

// ...
class NewsletterManager
{
    private $mailer;

    /**
     * @required
     */
    public function setMailer(MailerInterface $mailer): void
    {
        $this->mailer = $mailer;
    }

    // ...
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
# config/services.yaml
services:
    # ...

    app.newsletter_manager:
        class: App\Mail\NewsletterManager
        calls:
            - setMailer: ['@mailer']

This time the advantages are:

  • Setter injection works well with optional dependencies. If you do not need the dependency, then do not call the setter.
  • You can call the setter multiple times. This is particularly useful if the method adds the dependency to a collection. You can then have a variable number of dependencies.
  • Like the immutable-setter one, this type of injection works well with traits and allows you to compose your service.

The disadvantages of setter injection are:

  • The setter can be called more than once, also long after initialization, so you cannot be sure the dependency is not replaced during the lifetime of the object (except by explicitly writing the setter method to check if it has already been called).
  • You cannot be sure the setter will be called and so you need to add checks that any required dependencies are injected.

Property Injection

Another possibility is setting public fields of the class directly:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
// ...
class NewsletterManager
{
    public $mailer;

    // ...
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
# config/services.yaml
services:
    # ...

    app.newsletter_manager:
        class: App\Mail\NewsletterManager
        properties:
            mailer: '@mailer'

There are mainly only disadvantages to using property injection, it is similar to setter injection but with this additional important problem:

  • You cannot control when the dependency is set at all, it can be changed at any point in the object's lifetime.

But, it is useful to know that this can be done with the service container, especially if you are working with code that is out of your control, such as in a third party library, which uses public properties for its dependencies.

This work, including the code samples, is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license.
TOC
    Version