Skip to content

How Does the Security access_control Work?

Edit this page

For each incoming request, Symfony checks each access_control entry to find one that matches the current request. As soon as it finds a matching access_control entry, it stops - only the first matching access_control is used to enforce access.

Each access_control has several options that configure two different things:

  1. should the incoming request match this access control entry
  2. once it matches, should some sort of access restriction be enforced:

1. Matching Options

Symfony uses ChainRequestMatcher for each access_control entry, which determines which implementation of RequestMatcherInterface should be used on this request. The following access_control options are used for matching:

  • path: a regular expression (without delimiters)
  • ip or ips: netmasks are also supported (can be a comma-separated string)
  • port: an integer
  • host: a regular expression
  • methods: one or many HTTP methods
  • request_matcher: a service implementing RequestMatcherInterface
  • attributes: an array, which can be used to specify one or more request attributes that must match exactly
  • route: a route name

Take the following access_control entries as an example:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
# config/packages/security.yaml
parameters:
    env(TRUSTED_IPS): '10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2'

security:
    # ...
    access_control:
        - { path: '^/admin', roles: ROLE_USER_PORT, ip: 127.0.0.1, port: 8080 }
        - { path: '^/admin', roles: ROLE_USER_IP, ip: 127.0.0.1 }
        - { path: '^/admin', roles: ROLE_USER_HOST, host: symfony\.com$ }
        - { path: '^/admin', roles: ROLE_USER_METHOD, methods: [POST, PUT] }

        # ips can be comma-separated, which is especially useful when using env variables
        - { path: '^/admin', roles: ROLE_USER_IP, ips: '%env(TRUSTED_IPS)%' }
        - { path: '^/admin', roles: ROLE_USER_IP, ips: [127.0.0.1, ::1, '%env(TRUSTED_IPS)%'] }

        # for custom matching needs, use a request matcher service
        - { roles: ROLE_USER, request_matcher: App\Security\RequestMatcher\MyRequestMatcher }

        # require ROLE_ADMIN for 'admin' route. You can use the shortcut "route: "xxx", instead of "attributes": ["_route": "xxx"]
        - { attributes: {'_route': 'admin'}, roles: ROLE_ADMIN }
        - { route: 'admin', roles: ROLE_ADMIN }

For each incoming request, Symfony will decide which access_control to use based on the URI, the client's IP address, the incoming host name, and the request method. Remember, the first rule that matches is used, and if ip, port, host or method are not specified for an entry, that access_control will match any ip, port, host or method. See the following examples:

Example #1:
  • URI /admin/user
  • IP: 127.0.0.1, Port: 80, Host: example.com, Method: GET
  • Rule applied: rule #2 (ROLE_USER_IP)
  • Why? The URI matches path and the IP matches ip.
Example #2:
  • URI /admin/user
  • IP: 127.0.0.1, Port: 80, Host: symfony.com, Method: GET
  • Rule applied: rule #2 (ROLE_USER_IP)
  • Why? The path and ip still match. This would also match the ROLE_USER_HOST entry, but only the first access_control match is used.
Example #3:
  • URI /admin/user
  • IP: 127.0.0.1, Port: 8080, Host: symfony.com, Method: GET
  • Rule applied: rule #1 (ROLE_USER_PORT)
  • Why? The path, ip and port match.
Example #4:
  • URI /admin/user
  • IP: 168.0.0.1, Port: 80, Host: symfony.com, Method: GET
  • Rule applied: rule #3 (ROLE_USER_HOST)
  • Why? The ip doesn't match neither the first rule nor the second rule.
  • So the third rule (which matches) is used.
Example #5:
  • URI /admin/user
  • IP: 168.0.0.1, Port: 80, Host: symfony.com, Method: POST
  • Rule applied: rule #3 (ROLE_USER_HOST)
  • Why? The third rule still matches. This would also match the fourth rule
  • (ROLE_USER_METHOD), but only the first matched access_control is used.
Example #6:
  • URI /admin/user
  • IP: 168.0.0.1, Port: 80, Host: example.com, Method: POST
  • Rule applied: rule #4 (ROLE_USER_METHOD)
  • Why? The ip and host don't match the first three entries, but
  • the fourth - ROLE_USER_METHOD - matches and is used.
Example #7:
  • URI /foo
  • IP: 127.0.0.1, Port: 80, Host: symfony.com, Method: POST
  • Rule applied: matches no entries
  • Why? This doesn't match any access_control rules, since its URI
  • doesn't match any of the path values.

Caution

Matching the URI is done without $_GET parameters. Deny access in PHP code if you want to disallow access based on $_GET parameter values.

2. Access Enforcement

Once Symfony has decided which access_control entry matches (if any), it then enforces access restrictions based on the roles, allow_if and requires_channel options:

  • roles If the user does not have the given role, then access is denied (internally, an AccessDeniedException is thrown).
  • allow_if If the expression returns false, then access is denied;
  • requires_channel If the incoming request's channel (e.g. http) does not match this value (e.g. https), the user will be redirected (e.g. redirected from http to https, or vice versa).

Tip

Behind the scenes, the array value of roles is passed as the $attributes argument to each voter in the application with the Request as $subject. You can learn how to use your custom attributes by reading How to Use Voters to Check User Permissions.

Caution

If you define both roles and allow_if, and your Access Decision Strategy is the default one (affirmative), then the user will be granted access if there's at least one valid condition. If this behavior doesn't fit your needs, change the Access Decision Strategy.

Tip

If access is denied, the system will try to authenticate the user if not already (e.g. redirect the user to the login page). If the user is already logged in, the 403 "access denied" error page will be shown. See How to Customize Error Pages for more information.

Matching access_control By IP

Certain situations may arise when you need to have an access_control entry that only matches requests coming from some IP address or range. For example, this could be used to deny access to a URL pattern to all requests except those from a trusted, internal server.

Caution

As you'll read in the explanation below the example, the ips option does not restrict to a specific IP address. Instead, using the ips key means that the access_control entry will only match this IP address, and users accessing it from a different IP address will continue down the access_control list.

Here is an example of how you configure some example /internal* URL pattern so that it is only accessible by requests from the local server itself:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
# config/packages/security.yaml
security:
    # ...
    access_control:
        #
        # the 'ips' option supports IP addresses and subnet masks
        - { path: '^/internal', roles: PUBLIC_ACCESS, ips: [127.0.0.1, ::1, 192.168.0.1/24] }
        - { path: '^/internal', roles: ROLE_NO_ACCESS }

Here is how it works when the path is /internal/something coming from the external IP address 10.0.0.1:

  • The first access control rule is ignored as the path matches but the IP address does not match either of the IPs listed;
  • The second access control rule is enabled (the only restriction being the path) and so it matches. If you make sure that no users ever have ROLE_NO_ACCESS, then access is denied (ROLE_NO_ACCESS can be anything that does not match an existing role, it only serves as a trick to always deny access).

But if the same request comes from 127.0.0.1 or ::1 (the IPv6 loopback address):

  • Now, the first access control rule is enabled as both the path and the ip match: access is allowed as the user always has the PUBLIC_ACCESS role.
  • The second access rule is not examined as the first rule matched.

Securing by an Expression

Once an access_control entry is matched, you can deny access via the roles key or use more complex logic with an expression in the allow_if key:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
# config/packages/security.yaml
security:
    # ...
    access_control:
        -
            path: ^/_internal/secure
            # the 'roles' and 'allow_if' options work like an OR expression, so
            # access is granted if the expression is TRUE or the user has ROLE_ADMIN
            roles: 'ROLE_ADMIN'
            allow_if: "'127.0.0.1' == request.getClientIp() or request.headers.has('X-Secure-Access')"

In this case, when the user tries to access any URL starting with /_internal/secure, they will only be granted access if the IP address is 127.0.0.1 or a secure header, or if the user has the ROLE_ADMIN role.

Note

Internally allow_if triggers the built-in ExpressionVoter as like it was part of the attributes defined in the roles option.

Inside the expression, you have access to a number of different variables and functions including request, which is the Symfony Request object (see The HttpFoundation Component).

For a list of the other functions and variables, see functions and variables.

Tip

The allow_if expressions can also contain custom functions registered with expression providers.

Restrict to a port

Add the port option to any access_control entries to require users to access those URLs via a specific port. This could be useful for example for localhost:8080.

1
2
3
4
5
# config/packages/security.yaml
security:
    # ...
    access_control:
        - { path: ^/cart/checkout, roles: PUBLIC_ACCESS, port: 8080 }

Forcing a Channel (http, https)

You can also require a user to access a URL via SSL; use the requires_channel argument in any access_control entries. If this access_control is matched and the request is using the http channel, the user will be redirected to https:

1
2
3
4
5
# config/packages/security.yaml
security:
    # ...
    access_control:
        - { path: ^/cart/checkout, roles: PUBLIC_ACCESS, requires_channel: https }
This work, including the code samples, is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license.
TOC
    Version